You may think that, but it's true. Also, you never heard of it. Seriously? It's a juvenile. It's not fully grown. It was confirmed by Scientists. So don't think Sue is THE largest. It's a myth.

A 40 foot long juvenile coelurosaur is impossible.

Well, too bad. It's possible now. It's called "Tufts Love Rex," it did at the age o 15. Paleontologist say it's not fully grown so yeah. So no you're wrong.

In it's all in the evidence I have conducted. Tyrannosaurus growth patterns weren't exactly orderly. Take, Sue into account with specimen AMNH 5027, though both vary in height, both specimens are roughly the same size in length and AMNH 5027 is only a juvenile, but is practically resembles a full grown adult Rex. In aspect a T.Rex grown rate is similar to a person's, with the outcome being very unpredictable for each individual, some growing faster, while some others grow slower.

So if it's fully grown, it will be at least around 14 meters.

I doubt it. It's basically at full size already. There's no way it could be 14 meters, that's much longer than Sue (12.3 meters) and almost as long as Spinosaurus (15+ meters).

Dude even I know it's not fully grown. No T.Rex at 10ft tall is fully grown, common sense. But that doesn't a T.Rex of that size still wouldn't grow a little faster than the average T.Rex. Look at Trix, she is suppose to be 42ft yet the specimen is about 10ft, exactly like AMNH 5027.

I'm not stupid it's in the estimates I've carefully estimated the bones using a specific technique and broke it down. The average Tyrannosaurus, Sue grows to 40ft long and 12ft at the hips. But as these other specimens show the growth pattern can become sporadic. It's even shown within the mass level of Tyrannosaurus by analyzing the body dimensions in A Computational Analysis of Limb and Body Dimensions in Tyrannosaurus rex with Implications for Locomotion, Ontogeny, and Growth.

JR Hutchinson and his colleges explain in this paper of the sporadic growth of each T.Rex specimen of the two body types this animal has. With this they concluded in their studies that that Sue is the largest in mass for a fully Tyrannosaurus, while in contrast specimen CM 9380 is roughly estimated with a similar mass range, a specimen that is only a sub-adult like AMNH 5027, demonstrating the equilibrium and uniqueness in Tyrannosaurus individuals. It lays a connection to the estimates I've recently mentioned. Because of this shows that like humans, the Tyrannosaurus growth pattern is closely similar as they progress from teen to adult. Like many humans Tyrannosaurus experience growth spurts, in comparison to how some human kids and teenagers development in growth by puberty, specimens like AMNH 5027 and CM 9380 demonstrate that T.Rex developed rapid growth due to puberty of the production of growth hormones, such in the case with Thomas, which only a young adult, grew two feet higher than Sue and while specimens like Big Mike remained so short.

So the evidence is correct, nobody is wrong about it. And a few Paleontologists have agreed with my studies. In fact when you think about it the results are pretty obvious.

And if you are still in disbelief then here is a few charts that help evaluate this theory. I will leave you link to the Hutchinson paper on PLOSone as well.

https://www.deviantart.com/asuma17/art/Tyrannosaurus-specimen-Chart-update-2017-651768150

https://www.deviantart.com/asuma17/art/The-T-Rex-Specimen-Chart-641326435

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026037

Paleonazis? I'd rather call them accuracy nuts or feather nuts.

To each their own...but most of the Paleocommunity just call "Feathernazis" though as with I perfer to expand the term as some of these nuts don't terrorize and harass the Paleocommunity just inaccurate feathers. Hence "Paleonazi".