21 Votes in Poll
Giving it a sparse coat of quills instead of a full coat of proto-feathers may be slightly controversial, especially with that paper that classified Silesaurus as an Ornithischian, but the reason why it only has sparce quills is to show that Silesaurus is more primitive. Keeping with the theme of Triassic dinosaurs, next I'll do Coelophysis and then Eoraptor.
30 Votes in Poll
So, I was wondering did the Silesaurids have feathers or did they have scales? I asked that because I am drawing a Sacisaurus, and I want to know if giving it feathers is correct.
Here is an example of a feathered/fluffy silesaurid (Technosaurus, btw the art is by Jack Wood)
And here's an example of a silesaurid with scales (art by FreddyFan95)
So, which depiction is more correct scaled or feathered?
Btw unrelated to the topic but I have drawn this Oxalaia, the sail shape is speculative because I want to make it look like its own creature, than just another Spinosaurus.
Welp.. i should be thinking on math lesson.. silesaurus is better than maths
And I'm posting an cool drawing of Smok and Silesaurs that I found on DeviantArt
Named in 2010s
Dinosauriform from South America
One fact: The ilium is slender, and its blade has an extremely thin central portion (only 1 millimetre (0.039 in) thick), hence the epithet.