I mean more size comparisons I made when I was bored
Triceratops prorsus compared to gigantspinosaurus
Some theropods
Gallimimus and velociraptor
I was going to make one of the prince creek formation but I'm lazy
What are the inaccuracies?
31 Votes in Poll
30 Votes in Poll
25 Votes in Poll
16 Votes in Poll
31 Votes in Poll
I mean more size comparisons I made when I was bored
Triceratops prorsus compared to gigantspinosaurus
Some theropods
Gallimimus and velociraptor
I was going to make one of the prince creek formation but I'm lazy
What are the inaccuracies?
22 Votes in Poll
24 Votes in Poll
32 Votes in Poll
14 Votes in Poll
23 Votes in Poll
26 Votes in Poll
According to Everything Dinosaur (often a trustable source and a good place to buy museum quality dinosaur figures), the sauropod Gigantosaurus, which was named during the Victorian Era in 1869, does not exist. They are saying that Gigantosaurus is just a typo/mishmash of the dinosaurs Giganotosaurus and Gigantspinosaurus, both completely unrelated to Gigantosaurus megalonyx. I understand that they are saying that the dinosaur known as "Gigantosaurus" from the Disney Junior TV show of the same name is a Giganotosaurus himself, but that does not mean to say that a dinosaur known as Gigantosaurus never existed - it was named by Harry Govier Seeley in 1869 and it was found in Cambridgeshire, UK. The evidence, the fossils, still exist today, so I have just proved Everything Dinosaur wrong for once.
People do often get Giganotosaurus and Gigantosaurus confused - they often call the large theropod Gigantosaurus by mistake, but that does not mean that Everything Dinosaur should deny an entire genus from existing; definitely not a genus that has full authority and one that has been valid for over 150 years.
35 Votes in Poll