34 Votes in Poll
Again.... MIGHT be Bigger, its just speculation, it may be or may not be truly bigger
@11duckhunt wtf are you on
Mcraeensis was likely around the 7.8-8 Ton Range, far less than Scotty who is 10.4 Tons
Mcrae doesnt have a femur lil bro
The 7 - 8 Ton range still comes from one specimen, larger specimens may be found that rival T.Rexes like Scotty in size.
"This is approximately 5–7 million years before T. rex, which existed at the end of the Maastrichtian. T. mcraeensis was estimated at 12 metres (39 ft) long, which is similar to the size of an adult T. rex. The two are distinguished by characters of the skull."
-Wikipedia-
"The animal has been dubbed Tyrannosaurus mcraensis and grew to the same size as a T-Rex, about 12-metres (40ft) and weighing ten tons, and was roughly the same in proportions. However, the sister species is thought to have existed before the T-Rex and lived around seven million years earlier."
-The Telegraph-
From the studies I could find, T.Mcraensis had similar proportions to T.Rex, and generally grew to a similar size, with The One Described Specimen estimated to be around 11 - 12 Meters (Or 36 - 40 Ft) and 7 - 8+ Tons (Or 14,000 - 16,000+ Lbs), with Larger Specimens yet to be found estimated to be similar in size with some of the larger T.Rex specimens like Scotty.
Mcraeensis's exact body proportions are unknown since it is just skull fragments and a chevron
This is coming from the person who believes Nanuqsaurus is 9 meters even though it's just speculation
The Telegraph is neither a study nor a reliable source.
Ok.... Your Point?
NvM (Misread)
What do you think?