NvM (Misread)

Nanuqsaurus, tyrannosaur from northern Alaska. Lived 69 million years ago. Not nanotyrannus

ALSO, Well Mcraensis's Exact Proportions are technically unknown, BUT, From the fossils we do have, it is highly likely that it did have similar proportions to T.Rex, and grew to a similar size... ALSO Well it still was highly likely a rather robust and bulky animal, and could have been slightly more lanky then T.Rex but still being powerfully built and bulky.

@11duckhunt Sorry.... Misread....

Yeah, Nanuqsaurus was not exactly 9 Meters, at best was 7 Meters... BUT, it was a fairly heavy animal with the largest estimated to get around 1,600 Kg, or 3,520 Lbs/1.76 Tons.

The 9 meter theory came into existence when it was theorized that the holotype was a juvenile and it could get bigger then 6 meters

The biggest individual is estimated to be 7 meters

Just said that...

BUT, Speculation is Speculation and can't be 100% proven without 100% true factual evidence.

Correct

I was more referring to the fact that they were saying that T.mcraeensis being bigger then T.rex is incorrect even though it's just speculation made by the scientists who named it.

Exactly, its speculation, current estimates do have it at a similar size to average T.Rexes, BUT, that's just one specimen, larger specimens maybe even as Large as Rexes like Scotty, maybe even bigger, we just don't know yet...

SO, Mcraeensis for now maybe unlikely to be 100% slightly bigger then T.Rex, but with future fossil discoveries, studies and descriptions of T.Mcraeensis, them we maybe able to 100% know if Mcraeensis was slightly smaller, the same size, or bigger then T.Rex

ALSO...

Mcraeensis and Rex Art.