Gracilis at most was only 15+ Cm Taller then Thylaco, that's not a big enough height advantage to truly be significant...

And Don't bring up the poster you used yesterday, its not 100% correct.

First you are using WIkipedia as your source for information on size, and now you are saying that the size comparisons from Wikipedia are not correct.

I use it so people can learn something about the animals, I don't necessarily entirely use it for size.

ALSO, Its the only website so far that you guys don't target.

AND, That particular size comparison is wrong to an extent, it did get right that Gracilis was taller then Thylaco, BUT, It was wrong by how much...

Smilodon Gracilis was upward of 85 Cm Tall, and 220 Lbs in Weight

Thylacosmilus was upward of 72 Cm Tall, and 265 Lbs in Weight.

It's a size graph comparison, do you seriously expect them to put weight on it. The size is from 2022, which is obviously more recent than those other size comparisons you gave, not that you gave a source for them and all.

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, sure.

260 Lbs for Thylaco has been pretty consistent since it was first described

@Scotalt Ough